Tuesday, August 30, 2011
Education Reform 101
Check out the excellent 6-part series on Education Reform, written by school teacher and blogger Jersey Jazzman, starting today on bluejersey.com
Another Way the GOP is Derailing the Economy
If Planned Parenthood didn't exist, what would be the GOP's biggest bogeyman? Arguably it would be Amtrak.
Rail transport is an often under-appreciated aspect of the engine that drives the economy. It is more fuel-efficient than automobiles, and the portion of the Northeast Corridor that runs through New Jersey is critical to the state's and nation's economy.
Yet, two days after Irene, a portion of the Amtrak system in New Jersey remains closed. This also impacts New Jersey Transit which uses the same tracks.
The faux-fiscal conservative GOP has consistently worked to reduce and eliminate Amtrak subsidies, probably because the typical passenger is not one of their millionaire benefactors. Yet, the impact on the economy due to workers unable to get to their jobs is never a factor in the GOP's calculation.
Europe and China are making huge investments in infrastructure to benefit their economies. Floods, snowstorms, and hurricanes are a fact of life in the northeast. Amtrak needs funds not only for their day-to-day operations, but to invest in preventative and restorative infrastructure so that events like those this past weekend don't make New Jersey less competitive in the world market.
Rail transport is an often under-appreciated aspect of the engine that drives the economy. It is more fuel-efficient than automobiles, and the portion of the Northeast Corridor that runs through New Jersey is critical to the state's and nation's economy.
Yet, two days after Irene, a portion of the Amtrak system in New Jersey remains closed. This also impacts New Jersey Transit which uses the same tracks.
The faux-fiscal conservative GOP has consistently worked to reduce and eliminate Amtrak subsidies, probably because the typical passenger is not one of their millionaire benefactors. Yet, the impact on the economy due to workers unable to get to their jobs is never a factor in the GOP's calculation.
Europe and China are making huge investments in infrastructure to benefit their economies. Floods, snowstorms, and hurricanes are a fact of life in the northeast. Amtrak needs funds not only for their day-to-day operations, but to invest in preventative and restorative infrastructure so that events like those this past weekend don't make New Jersey less competitive in the world market.
Tuesday, August 16, 2011
A Tax that Helps America Stay Competitive
The federal gas tax of 18.4¢ per gallon is set to expire at
the end of September. Today’s New York Times has an editorial titled The
Clear Case for the Gas Tax, enumerating several reasons why this tax should
not be allowed to expire. The money collected goes to the Highway Trust Fund,
which in turn creates jobs and upgrades our deteriorating infrastructure.
No doubt, the Tea Party Republicans will oppose a proposed
extension of this tax, claiming that in these tough times we need to reduce the
amount of money that the government collects. They will most certainly ignore
the fact that by further depleting the Highway Trust Fund, we will move
construction workers from the role of tax payer to the role of unemployment
insurance recipient.
There is a very small grain of truth to the Tea Party
Republicans’ assertion. One of the downsides of the gas tax is that a poor
person who drives 12,000 miles per year (the EPA estimate of average
American’s driving habits) pays roughly the same tax as the millionaire who
drives 12,000 miles per year. This makes the gasoline tax a regressive tax, i.e. one that has a
bigger impact on those with lower incomes.
To ameliorate this disparity, in addition to extending this
tax, Congress should address the issue of its impact on the poor.
At the current rate, a driver who gets 20 miles per gallon
and drives 12,000 miles per year pays $110.40 in federal gas tax.
But extending the current gas tax is not enough. Congress
should increase the tax for a number of reasons. It would more quickly
replenish the Highway Trust Fund, and consequently create more middle-class
jobs. Any increase in the price of
gasoline helps discourage driving and decreases the cost of dealing with
additional pollution and its health issues. While any tax increase would be
perceived as an outrage by the Tea Party Republicans, our gas taxes are
significantly lower than those in Europe (which also, by the way provides
inexpensive and effective medical care to all, not just the wealthy).
While taxes are good in that they provide jobs, essential
services, and infrastructure, these taxes must not be regressive. Doubling the gasoline tax would cost the
average driver $220.80 per year. Insignificant for the wealthy, but that $4.25
per week might make the difference between a child in a poor family getting a
decent meal or going hungry one more night.
So while Congress should double the federal gas tax, it
should also ensure that the burden does not fall upon those who could least
afford it. Any legislation should include a tax credit of around $200 for
automobile owners earning less than a set amount, say $30,000 per year. This
way, the burden will not fall upon the poor as so many other taxes do.
Such a progressive proposal has as much chance of passing in
the Tea Party controlled House as me becoming an Olympic athlete. But without improving our infrastructure,
America will continue down the path of becoming a first-world nation with
third-world services. And not having this discussion will ensure the Tea Party
mantra of tax elimination will continue to destroy America.
Wednesday, August 10, 2011
Republicans are not Terrorists
In a recent column,
writer Joe Nocera equated the members of the Tea Party to terrorists, pointing
out their “jihad on the American people.”
In response to Tea Party criticism, Nocera quickly issued an apology
for his “intemperate” language.
I have several friends who are Republicans. Some are
moderate, and some are Tea Partiers. They are certainly not terrorists – I would
categorize them as patriotic but perhaps misguided Americans. But let’s
separate my friends, who sincerely want what’s best for America, from the
Republican politicians and corporatists, who are driven by monetary greed, the
lust for power, and their focused goal of removing Barack Obama from office at
all costs.
Osama Bin Laden’s aim was to wreck the American economy and
instill fear among the American people. And with the assistance of the Bush/Rove/Koch
power mongers, he succeeded.
Merriam-Webster defines terror
as a state of intense fear. Certainly
today’s Republican leadership has succeeded in spreading that state of fear
across the nation – fear that any American Muslim is a potential suicide
bomber, fear that Hispanics will outnumber Caucasians in some areas and
dominate the voting process, fear that curtailing wasteful military spending
will cause us to be invaded by China or the Grand Duchy of Fenwick, fear that
if we don’t pray in school that God will look unfavorably on us, and fear that if
citizens can’t buy AK-47s without a background check, liberal thugs will rape,
pillage, and plunder their sometimes ill-begotten treasure.
Even more pernicious is the fact that though their tactics
are different, the current crop of Republican leaders, with the help of some
chickenshit Democrats, are working
toward the same outcome that Osama Bin Laden strived for – transforming America
into a third world banana republic.
So, Mr. Nocera, if your apology was aimed at average
Republican citizens, it was justified. But if your original column referred to
the leaders of the Tea Party Republicans, no apology was necessary. Rank-and-file
Republicans are not terrorists, but their leaders are moving this nation along
the path that will give Osama Bin Laden a posthumous victory.
Monday, August 1, 2011
American Exceptionalism
The Tea Party GOP is fond of citing the concept of American
Exceptionalism as justification for everything from prioritizing war over
diplomacy to cutting taxes for the wealthy. Arguably, the twentieth century
was, indeed, the century of American Exceptionalism.
In that century, we fought and won the War to End All Wars,
and followed it up with the development and deployment of weapons of mass
destruction to end the next war.
In the twentieth century, America exploited the fruits of
the Industrial Revolution, developing a manufacturing economy that paid decent
wages thanks to regulation and strong unions. We eradicated the scourges of
yellow fever and polio and put a man on the moon. Not only did we win the space
race, but we also won the Cold War, thanks in part to the Soviet Union’s
draining their resources on an ill-advised war in Afghanistan. We developed an
educational system with institutions from pre-school to post-graduate that
attracted people from all over the world. We invented the transistor and the
Internet and made Silicon Valley an engine of growth, opportunity, and
prosperity.
The common thread that ties this success story together is
government. Government grants for education boosted innovation. Government
regulation on fuel economy, the environment, and workplace safety were catalysts
for economic growth. Government research and development grants to spur
innovation helped a few large corporations and spawned thousands of small ones.
Millions of Americans were able to realize the dream of home ownership.
Unfortunately, the momentum has changed in the twenty first
century. The engine that drives the economy has stalled. American corporations
are shipping green jobs to China and America lags behind Europe and Asia in
investments in rail transportation. Tea Partiers cheer when someone like
Governor Chris Christie abandons an important rail transportation job in
mid-stream, throwing away billions of taxpayer dollars. In this century’s basic infrastructure race,
broadband, America is in the middle of the pack, just behind Luxembourg.
Of course, the decline in American Exceptionalism did not
occur overnight, nor is it finished yet.
The decline took root when Ronald Reagan hoodwinked the American people
by postulating that “Government is not a solution to our problem, government is
the problem.” But what really threw American Exceptionalism under the bus was
the administration of George W Bush and its demonstrably failed policy of
trickle-down economics. Bush’s legacy will be the demise of the middle class
and the rise to power of the corporate oligarchs. This trajectory toward banana
republic status was guaranteed by the Tea Party’s disdain for government
services (which they all use) and the taxes that pay for them.
Is there a way to revector this trajectory? Probably not in
the short term. Democrats have amply demonstrated their impotence in slowing
down the Republican-led demise of our economy, let alone reversing it.
Right-wing corporations control much of the mainstream media and Progressives
have to work twice as hard to get their truthful message out. Cuts in education
will make it easier for Republicans to “dumb-down” elections and win on
simplistic talking points about complex issues. With the recent election of Tea
Party governors in many states, voter suppression initiatives that hurt the
poor and unemployed are on the rise.
Eventually the Republicans will win the White House. If not
in 2012, then in 2016. To stay in power, as they exploit workers and the poor
and as they shift more jobs overseas, they will need something to rally around,
be it another war or terrorist attack.
American Exceptionalism helped us survive the Great
Depression and World War II. Is there enough left to help us survive the Tea
Party onslaught?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)