After a 34-year hiatus, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
approved a license for the construction of the first new nuclear reactor in the
United States since before the Three Mile Island catastrophe. Two reactors will
be constructed at a stated cost to ratepayers of $14 billion near Augusta,
Georgia, the second largest metropolitan area in the state with a population of
over a half million, plus another 30,000 troops stationed in nearby Fort
Gordon. In addition to the cost to the Southern Company’s ratepayers, the
construction is backed by an $8.3 billion federal loan guarantee paid for by
you and me.
Proponents of nuclear power contend that it is safer than it
has ever been. They say that a Fukushima-type disaster cannot happen here
because we don’t have simultaneous typhoons and earthquakes. But the bottom
line is that no man-made system is foolproof. Consider, for example, an area
where safety is paramount and large sums of money are spent on continuous
improvement: commercial aviation. Air travel is safer than ever, but tell that
to the 50 people who perished in Colgan Air Flight 3407 three years ago. Tragic
for sure, but other than to the families of those who perished, there has been no
lasting effect.
The impact of nuclear accidents, however, lingers for
generations. The area around the
Chernobyl plant is uninhabitable 26 years after that accident and will be so for the foreseeable future. No doubt, the
same will be true for the environs of the Japan disaster. But that’s not the
only legacy of nuclear power.
Today, the United States has no comprehensive plan for the
disposal of waste products from commercial power reactors. Tons of highly
radioactive detritus are generated each year, most of which is stored on-site –
a tempting target for terrorists. This is just another problem that we are
handing down to future generations.
A more sane and rational approach would be to divert those
billions of dollars to clean, renewable energy. Solar power is cost-competitive
with nuclear, and with some investment wind power is not far behind. Any
accident at a renewable-energy facility will not linger for generations as it
would for nuclear.
So if you’re planning on relocating to eastern Georgia, here’s
a map with a 50-mile radius circle around the new plant. That’s the distance
that the US Government recommended for evacuation after the Fukushima disaster.
Maybe such an accident will never happen here. But if it does, the costs in
lives, health, relocation, and economic losses will be overwhelming.
Kudos to the Obama administration for recognizing clean nuclear energy as a key component of our energy future.
ReplyDeleteThere is no such thing as clean nuclear energy.
ReplyDeleteYour dispute is with the Obama administration, not with me. When you pass regulations declaring carbon dioxide to be a pollutant, you come up with a different definition of "clean" than you might otherwise.
ReplyDelete