In political campaigns, you often hear candidates promise
that they will run the country like a business. To me, that’s almost a
disqualifier.
I live in New Jersey’s Third Congressional District, and the
two major party candidates are running for a seat being vacated by the
retirement of a former NFL football player.
The Republican candidate is an insurance CEO (who lives 90
miles outside the district) and touts his business experience as a reason why
the people of the district should send him to Washington. To me, being a
successful businessman has about as much relevance as being an NFL offensive
tackle when it comes to my vote.
As we see every day, the job of a lawmaker is to be
persuasive and build consensus. While I’m sure some business people have these
skills, most of the time businesspeople, especially CEOs, operate like a military unit where
orders are given, followed, and are rarely questioned. That’s not how Congress
works, especially for a freshman. Orders are not given, but rather compromise,
consensus, and common ground are sought. These qualities are not often seen in
the leadership of the business world.
Often, when candidates say they will run government like a
business, they allude to handling money and finances smartly and operating at a
profit. In fact, for most businesses, profit is the one and only criterion for
making important decisions. That’s why we see so many businesses with low
wages, offshore outsourcing, and flimsy quality controls. That’s not how
Congress or the government should work. The government is not there to make a
profit. It’s there to serve the people. And as far as prudent handling of money
is concerned, especially in the financial services industry, there are
companies like AIG and others that have demonstrated their leaders’ lack of
good judgment or even ethics. Any prudence that is exhibited by these CEOs is
primarily due to consumer protection laws and strict accounting standards,
things business executives typically lobby to relax, not make stricter.
So if successful CEOs are not a priori good candidates for congressional office, who is?
My answer is those people who are successful leaders of
volunteer charitable organizations.
Their success is based on persuasion – the ability to make a
case for others to part with their money or time. They do this not for
compensation, but because they want the country to be a better place. These are
qualities we need in members of Congress.
We’re fortunate here in New Jersey’s Third Congressional
District to have such a candidate running on the Democratic ticket. Aimee
Belgard is a defense attorney by profession, but has spent most of her adult
life as a volunteer executive for the American Cancer Society. She has raised
funds for medical research and patient care. Certainly this has required
persuasion skills, persistence, and the ability to show people what’s in it for
them. Wouldn’t it be wonderful if such qualities could be brought to the House
of Representatives?
Belgard has also demonstrated these skills as an elected
official in her role as a member of the county board of Freeholders. As one of
only two Democrats on a five-member board, she has shown her ability to work
with the GOP majority, strive for common ground, and make significant
accomplishments. In fact, her GOP counterparts have given her the ultimate
complement – they have taken credit for several of the programs that Belgard
has initiated.
So be wary when a candidate tells you he’ll run the country
like a business. That’s like an NFL tackle telling you he’ll remove your
spleen. It can be done, but there are unpleasant consequences.
No comments:
Post a Comment